Kyle CoyleProfessional Portfolio
Classroom practice · E4

Family Communication

Supporting learning together

← All classroom practices

Evidence and context

Context

This email exchange took place during my student teaching in seventh-grade science. It addresses concerns about a student’s grades, participation, and use of accommodations, and identifies ways to support learning at school and at home. Names have been replaced with [Student] and [Parent]; the original wording is otherwise preserved.

Message 1 - Parent to teachers

Message 2 - Teacher to parent

Message 3 - Parent to teacher

Message 4 - Teacher to parent

Competency and effect on learning

This email exchange demonstrates my ability to communicate with families by explaining classroom concerns, inviting the parent’s perspective, and suggesting specific ways to support learning. I described the student’s difficulty beginning and completing assignments and asking for help. I also asked which strategies had helped him in the past. His parent explained that he avoided accommodations because he did not want to feel singled out, which helped me better understand a barrier to his participation.

I clarified where the parent could find project instructions, examples, and rubrics, and suggested using an initialed agenda to communicate unfinished work and due dates. I also recommended having the student explain science concepts at home using his notes. The parent responded with a commitment to discuss his needs and check in weekly. Following this correspondence, I observed more active participation with fewer prompts and check-ins, and his science assessment scores began to improve. These changes suggested progress in engagement and learning, although I cannot attribute them solely to the email exchange. The communication gave us a shared starting point for supporting his learning at school and at home.

Modifications for future use

Following this correspondence, I observed that [Student] participated more actively with fewer prompts and check-ins, and his science assessment scores began to improve. However, he still submitted the project after the deadline. This mixed progress showed that improved participation and understanding did not yet translate into consistently meeting deadlines. For future use, I would end the email with agreed follow-up dates and clear indicators of progress, including whether assignments were submitted on time. The exchange encouraged collaboration, but the parent did not reply to my final email, and our communication ended without a follow-up. This limited my ability to learn whether the suggested strategies were helping at home. In the future, I would take a more proactive role by initiating follow-up communication rather than waiting for the parent to respond. I would schedule an initial update one week after the exchange and a second review two weeks later, including the specific dates in the email.

At each follow-up, I would send a brief summary of assignments completed and submitted, how often the student began work with fewer prompts or asked for clarification, and how the agreed supports were helping him access tasks. I would also include evidence of science understanding from a recent exit ticket, assignment, or assessment, identifying one area of improvement and one remaining difficulty. I would compare these indicators with the previous week and invite the parent to share observations from home. We could then decide which strategies to continue or adjust. This would help us evaluate whether our communication and support were improving learning rather than relying only on the overall grade.